editor's note: for a detailed explanation of a movie forecast, click heredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d23bf/d23bf6565a0ee9ea9ef683ec8a6851649dab01b8" alt=""
it's curious that tom cruise has received so much public backlash even though he hasn't done anything illegal or immoral or scandalous. the only thing he has done to alienate the masses is zealously and shamelessly promote an eccentric religion, which as a side effect may or may not have resulted in
erratic behavior. for example, michael jackson has collected criticism because of sexual abuse allegations,
michael vick has received derision because of his involvement in dog fighting, and oj simpson has become a social pariah because he made
naked gun 33⅓: the final insult, among
other things. but all tom cruise has done is
ask people to
join his church. probably the worst thing that he did was call matt lauer 'glib.' yet, people react to him as if he
eats out of a dumpster or performs illegal abortions with wire hangers. consequently, cruise's recent movies have relatively under-performed at the box office. while their disappointing performances can't be entirely attributed to an anti-cruise sentiment, it did have an effect to the point that many people did not go to see his movies simply because he was in it. it's as if people think they'll be brainwashed into believing scientology or contract gonorrhea just by watching one of his movies.
at any rate, the latest film to feature tom cruise is
valkyrie, which is about an assassination attempt on
adolf hitler during world war ii. when first hearing about this premise, i thought that tom cruise was going to embrace his growing villain reputation and tackle the role of hitler. instead, he does the opposite and plays the penultimate good guy as the person who is leading the charge to kill hitler. he even wears an eye patch most likely to gain sympathy from audiences. i ask why not give him a sickly kid with rickets to complete the effect? anyway, all things tom cruise aside, the main reason that i have high expectations for this movie is its director, bryan singer. with film credits such as
the usual suspects,
x2 and the underrated
superman returns, singer is a director who is able to weave both intricate and interesting stories in a wholly unique style that doesn't sacrifice substance. with him at the helm, i can't
foresee
valkyrie will be any different.
prognosis : 8/10
1 comment:
Good post Ninja, I think I might read your blog more often. It's funny how people speak of Tom Cruise's "comeback." MI:3 was a moderate hit, was it not? It wasn't that long ago, was it?
Post a Comment